<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Boxes and Arrows: Comments by ed.j. bowers</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/person/1018</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by ed.j. bowers</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Back before I knew any of these concepts had labels I always tried to find the balance between getting the client to understand (and agree to) the process or functional flow and avoiding getting locked into a &amp;#8216;design&amp;#8217; discussion. (Or the other way around when I was discussing the visuals) I started with yellow pages on the floor, index cards, blackboards. I like powerpoint because it is fast and visually close to a browser look but I have also taken a rough jpeg and used it as background of an html page with basic mapped links so that we can load it into a real browser. It all starts with understanding your audience; which I suppose can apply to everything out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the_guided_wire#content_3026</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/the_guided_wire#content_3026</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ed.j. bowers</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I find this piece very interesting and possibly helpful; if only from an emotional perspective. I didn&amp;#8217;t know there were Content Strategists but I have been struggling to define a content strategy on my new job. We are a mid-sized firm offering Organizational and  Personal Health resources and services. And we have just merged with one of our primary competitors.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;My challenge now is to sort out 7 or 8 years of legacy content from 2 organizations that now must think as one, so thank you for adding another couple of concepts to my portfolio.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the#content_5620</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the#content_5620</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:26:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ed.j. bowers</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d like to see this. We are moving to a more rigidly requirements based development model and of course often sacrifice detailed requirements for speed of delivery. So, lead on McDuff&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/13214#content_13236</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/idea/view/13214#content_13236</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>ed.j. bowers</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
