<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on Crossing Boundaries: 2005 IA Summit Wrapup: Overview and Pre-Sessions</title>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/crossing_boundaries_2005_ia_summit_wrapup_overview_and_pre_sessions</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Beyond technology and technique, this year's summit revealed that the goals of information architecture are evolving beyond the usual ones of retrieval via search and browse. Boxes and Arrows shares some thoughts on the event, it's future and short summaries of many sessions.</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Just a quick note about &amp;#8220;disneyfication&amp;#8221; of taxonomies: I believe the reference was made to how Disney usually lifts a local fairy tale (like the hunchback or pochahontas) and cleans away all the &amp;#8220;dangerous&amp;#8221; cultural connotations to fit it to a global market without offending anyone. A similar case can be made against a taxonomy crafted to fit in to any cultural context; we might loose something vital on the way there. But the main point I was trying to make was not necessarily about american cultural &amp;#8220;propaganda&amp;#8221;, but one about  what we might loose on the way from a locally rooted taxonomy (or fairy tale) to a global one-size-fits-all taxonomy (or the Disney-version of that fairy tale).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/crossing_boundaries_2005_ia_summit_wrapup_overview_and_pre_sessions#content_2242</link>
      <guid>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/crossing_boundaries_2005_ia_summit_wrapup_overview_and_pre_sessions#content_2242</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:52:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Are Gjertin Urkegjerde Halland</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

